This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0888325408318533v1 22/3/668    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Clark, J. N. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Collective Guilt, Collective Responsibility and the Serbs

Can an entire nation be collectively guilty for crimes committed in its name? Focusing on the case of Serbia, this article argues that collective guilt is a morally flawed and untenable concept that should be rejected. It presents various moral and practical objections to both the generic notion of collective guilt and the more specific idea of Serbian collective guilt and contends that the latter is a fundamental impediment to peace-building and reconciliation in the former Yugoslavia. On what basis might it be argued that the Serbs are collectively guilty? To claim that they are collectively guilty for having supported Miloevi both exaggerates levels of support for the former Serbian leader and does a major injustice to those individuals who bravely fought against the Miloevi regime. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt and Karl Jaspers, the article concludes by suggesting that perhaps we can speak of Serbian collective responsibility.

Key Words: Serbs • Miloevi • collective guilt • collective responsibility • collective denial • Second Serbia

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?